METHOD AND DEVICE FOR PREDICTIVE DETERMINATION OF CHARACTERISTIC PARAMETERS OF THE OPERATION OF A TU

专利摘要:
The present invention relates to a method for predictive determination of a power necessary for a hovering flight of a rotary wing aircraft (10) for a landing. Said method makes it possible, after a measurement of a current atmospheric pressure and a current temperature external to said aircraft (10), to estimate a predictive atmospheric pressure and a predictive temperature at the altitude of realization of said hovering flight. Then, a maximum power available at a power plant (20) of said aircraft (10) once said aircraft (10) has arrived at the point of performance of said hovering and a power of said power plant (20) necessary for said performance of said hover are calculated. The present invention finally makes it possible to display said maximum available power and said necessary power on an instrument of said aircraft (10) and thus to alert the pilot of said aircraft (10) when said characteristic power is close to or even greater than said maximum available power .
公开号:FR3084057A1
申请号:FR1800756
申请日:2018-07-17
公开日:2020-01-24
发明作者:Serge Germanetti
申请人:Airbus Helicopters SAS；
IPC主号:

专利说明:

Method and device for predictive determination of parameters characteristic of the operation of a rotary wing aircraft for carrying out a predetermined maneuver.
The present invention is in the field of aid to piloting aircraft, and rotary wing aircraft in particular.
The present invention relates to a method and a device for predictive determination of at least one characteristic power necessary for carrying out a predetermined maneuver of a rotary wing aircraft such as hovering and / or landing of the aircraft. aircraft and with maximum available power. The present invention also relates to a method and a device for predictive determination of at least one characteristic power necessary for carrying out a predetermined maneuver and of parameters characteristic of the operation of the aircraft associated with each power in order to anticipate an overshoot d 'a limitation of at least one of these characteristic parameters likely to occur when the predetermined maneuver is carried out.
The operation of an aircraft is generally carried out under the supervision of several characteristic parameters by means of several instruments located on an instrument panel of the aircraft. These characteristic parameters are representative of the current operation of the aircraft and in particular of its engine or of its power plant.
For physical reasons, there are many limitations on these characteristic parameters which must be taken into account at all times during the operation of the aircraft. These various limitations may depend on the external conditions as well as on the operating mode of the aircraft. For example, for a rotary wing aircraft comprising a power plant provided with two turboshaft engines and a main power transmission box, the power plant driving in rotation at least one main rotor and possibly a tail rotor, such as a rear rotor. , these characteristic parameters can be, among others, the rotation speed Ng of the gas generator of each turbine engine, the temperature T4 of gas ejection at the inlet of the free turbine of each turbine engine and the engine torque C _m of each turbine engine.
Thus, the pilot of an aircraft must monitor, during a flight and continuously, the current values of these characteristic parameters on several instruments located on the instrument panel of the aircraft and compare the current values of these characteristic parameters with their respective limitations.
In addition, these limitations are generally different depending on the flight phase of the aircraft and / or the external conditions such as temperature and altitude for example. Indeed, according to each flight phase and / or the external conditions as well as according to the mode of operation of the power plant, the maximum power that the power plant can provide is different. Consequently, the limitations of the various parameters characteristic of the operation of the aircraft may be different, in particular depending on the power available at the level of each turbine engine.
Today, certain aids provided to the pilot make it possible to limit the parameters that the pilot must monitor.
We are particularly aware of the documents FR 2749545 and FR 2756256 which describe a First Limitation Instrument often designated by the acronym "IPL". This First Limitation Instrument identifies, among various characteristic parameters, the critical characteristic parameter as being that which is closest to its limit value. The current value of this critical characteristic parameter and its limit value are then grouped together on a single display, respectively for each turbine engine if necessary, making it possible to limit the number of instruments necessary to monitor the operation of the aircraft in order to simplify the task. of the pilot. These IPLs thus make it possible to display, via the current value of the critical characteristic parameter and its limit value, a power margin available to the aircraft or indeed to each turbine engine.
For example, the current value of the critical characteristic parameter and its limit value can be displayed according to a graduated scale in engine torque for each turbine engine, thus characterizing the available power margin of each turbine engine of the aircraft, as described in document FR2749545.
The current value of the critical characteristic parameter and its limit value can also be displayed according to a graduated scale in collective pitch, the collective pitch indicating the incidence of the blades of the main rotor of the aircraft with respect to the incident wind induced by the pitch control. collective of these blades, thus characterizing the available power margin of the aircraft as a whole, as described in document FR 2756256.
However, the limitations used by the dashboard instruments and this IPL in particular do not represent the actual limitations of each turbine engine, but predetermined limitations corresponding, for example, to a guaranteed minimum power of a turbine engine over its lifetime. .
Indeed, the engine manufacturer establishes, by calculation or by tests, the available power curves of a turboshaft engine as a function in particular of the altitude of the aircraft and the outside temperature, and this for each of the power regimes usable by each turbine engine. In addition, the engine manufacturer determines these available power curves according to different levels of aging of each turbine engine between a new turbine engine and a turbine engine that has reached the end of its service life.
As a result, a guaranteed minimum power over the entire service life of a turbine engine is defined. The value of this guaranteed minimum power is variable in particular as a function of the altitude of the aircraft and the outside temperature, and corresponds to the power supplied by an aged turbine engine, namely a turbine engine having reached its maximum service life. Thus, any turbine engine in normal operation, that is to say experiencing no failure, can always deliver a power greater than and at least equal to this guaranteed minimum power over its entire lifetime.
In this way, the dashboard instruments and the IPL in particular, which use limitations corresponding to this guaranteed minimum power, are favorable in terms of safety, the pilot always having a power really available at each turbine engine which is generally higher and at least equal to the maximum power indicated by the dashboard instruments or by the IPL.
However, the available power margin of each engine of the aircraft power plant vis-à-vis this guaranteed minimum power can be determined during an "engine health" check, also designated by the acronym EPC for the English designation "Engine Power Check". Such an engine health check is generally recommended by the engine manufacturer and must be carried out regularly. An engine health check makes it possible to check the operating state of an engine and to determine the level of deterioration and / or aging of this engine. An engine health check thus makes it possible to periodically check the maximum and actual performance of the engine in relation to the guaranteed minimum performance.
The engine health check is thus carried out by comparing the current performance of the engine with the performance of this engine obtained on a test bench and declared by the manufacturer. The engine health check makes it possible to determine a margin of one or more monitoring parameters of this engine relative to a limit value of each monitoring parameter and, consequently, to determine the available power margin which is the difference between the maximum power it can deliver and its minimum power guaranteed for current environmental conditions. Current environmental conditions are for example information relating to the environment of the aircraft and more particularly atmospheric conditions. In addition, it can be deduced, thanks to these monitoring parameters, if the engine has undergone damage and if it must undergo maintenance operations, in particular in order to be able to supply again the mechanical powers for which it is suitable.
For example, if this engine is a turboshaft engine, a monitoring parameter can be the internal temperature T4 of the gases at the inlet of the free turbine, the rotation speed Ng of the gas generator or the engine torque C _m delivered by the turbine engine. In addition, an engine health check must be carried out according to a procedure predetermined by the manufacturer. This engine health check can be performed during the flight or between two flights.
In addition, instruments on the instrument panel of an aircraft, including the IPL, indicate the current values and limits of one or more characteristic parameters. In fact, when a pilot plans to perform a maneuver, he must rely on his experience and the difference he finds between these current values and their limits in order to estimate whether he has sufficient margin on the characteristic parameters for performing this maneuver.
Then, the pilot will have confirmation only during this maneuver that no characteristic parameter exceeds its limit and that he can therefore carry out this maneuver safely.
Otherwise and depending on the maneuver performed, the pilot can stop this maneuver to return to a safe flight phase, each characteristic parameter then remaining below its limit. This is typically the case when the pilot of an aircraft initiates a descent and can use the inertia of the aircraft and / or the total power available at the power plant to perform an avoidance maneuver. of an obstacle. However, for certain maneuvers, a rollback is impossible once the maneuver has started and an accident can occur then, for example during a landing and the transition out of ground effect and with ground effect.
This poor estimation by the pilot of the available margin, in particular in terms of power, is the source of numerous accidents with rotary wing aircraft and in particular during the landing phases, of hovering flights in particular close to the ground and takeoff in pure vertical mode.
Documents FR 3033316 and WO 2012/087303 partially overcome these drawbacks and describe a method and a system for monitoring parameters of an aircraft using the available power margin of its engines vis-à-vis the minimum guaranteed power, this margin of available power having been determined during an engine health check.
The document FR 3033316 describes a method for determining characteristic parameters of an aircraft allowing in particular the pilot to simultaneously view the current values and the actual limits of at least one characteristic parameter of the operation of this aircraft as well as the value of each characteristic parameter necessary to carry out a predetermined maneuver. A characteristic parameter of the operation of this aircraft is in particular the power of its power plant.
Document WO 2012/087303 describes a power monitoring system for a rotary wing aircraft indicating, at the current time and as a function of current flight conditions, on the one hand, a power available at the level of its power plant and of 'on the other hand a power necessary for the realization of a hovering flight as well as the power currently used.
According to these documents, the power required to perform the predetermined maneuver, such as performing a hover, is estimated based on the current flight conditions of the aircraft. However, this maneuver will not be carried out under these current conditions of flight of the aircraft, but under the conditions that the aircraft will meet during the actual carrying out of this maneuver. Indeed, these flight conditions can change depending on the advance of the aircraft and in particular its change in altitude, for example when the aircraft is in an approach phase for a landing or for a rescue mission requiring a hovering.
The pilot of the aircraft can thus have information according to which the aircraft has sufficient available power to carry out a predetermined maneuver under the current flight conditions of the aircraft while once in the area of carrying out this predetermined maneuver, the flight conditions of the aircraft are generally different and the power actually available may then not be sufficient for carrying out this predetermined maneuver, the aircraft then risking a crash.
The prior art therefore does not make it possible to anticipate and predict precisely the flight conditions of the aircraft that it will encounter when carrying out a predetermined maneuver and, consequently, a power necessary for carrying out this maneuver predetermined. This predetermined maneuver is for example a hovering carried out at the end of an approach phase, in particular for a landing.
The object of the present invention is therefore to propose a method and a device making it possible to overcome the limitations mentioned above, by making it possible to determine in a predictive manner at least one characteristic power necessary for carrying out a predetermined maneuver of a rotary wing aircraft as well as a maximum available power of this aircraft according to the flight conditions present at the position for carrying out this predetermined maneuver in order to anticipate a limitation being exceeded of at least one of the characteristic parameters of the aircraft likely to intervene when the predetermined maneuver is carried out.
An object according to the invention is a method for predictive determination of at least one characteristic power necessary for carrying out a predetermined maneuver of a rotary wing aircraft, the aircraft comprising a plurality of sensors, at least one computer or indeed a processor, at least one memory and at least one display device.
The rotary wing aircraft also comprises a main rotor provided with main blades, an anti-torque rotor provided with secondary blades of the means for controlling the movements of the aircraft and a power plant provided with at least one engine, for example a turboshaft engine, and a mechanical power transmission means. The mechanical power transmission means is a main power transmission box rotating the main rotor and the anti-torque rotor. The control means are means for controlling the variation of the collective pitch and the cyclic pitch of the main blades of the main rotor as well as the collective pitch of the secondary blades of the anti-torque rotor.
The method according to the invention comprises the following main steps:
a first measurement of a current atmospheric pressure Pc and of a current temperature Te external to the aircraft at a current altitude Zc of the aircraft,
a first determination of at least one parameter relating either to the current altitude Zc of the aircraft, or to a predictive altitude Zp of carrying out the predetermined maneuver of the aircraft, or to the current altitude Zc of the aircraft and at the predicted altitude Zp for carrying out the predetermined maneuver,
a second determination of a predictive atmospheric pressure Pp at the predictive altitude Zp,
a third determination of a predictive temperature Tp at the predictive altitude Zp,
a fourth determination of a maximum power available at the level of the power plant at the predictive altitude Zp taking into account the predictive atmospheric pressure Pp and the predictive temperature Tp, and
a fifth determination of at least one power characteristic of the power plant necessary for carrying out a predetermined maneuver of the aircraft.
In this way, the method according to the invention advantageously makes it possible to determine the flight conditions of the aircraft at the predictive altitude Zp corresponding to the point of completion of the predetermined maneuver that the aircraft is to carry out, these flight conditions generally being different from the current flight conditions of the aircraft. Next, the method according to the invention makes it possible to estimate, as a function of these flight conditions at predictive altitude Zp, the maximum power available at the power plant of the aircraft at predictive altitude Zp.
Knowledge of this maximum power available at the power plant of the aircraft at the predictive altitude Zp then allows the pilot to advantageously anticipate the completion of the predetermined maneuver at the predictive altitude Zp, the power characteristic of l the power plant necessary for carrying out this predetermined maneuver of the aircraft also being estimated. The predetermined maneuver can thus be prepared and carried out safely when the maximum power available at the predictive altitude Zp is sufficient to allow the predetermined maneuver to be carried out. In this way, the pilot can advantageously anticipate any exceedance of a limitation of the maximum power of the power plant of the aircraft likely to occur when the predetermined maneuver is carried out.
The method according to the invention may then include an additional step of displaying, simultaneously, the maximum power available at the power plant at the predictive altitude Zp and at least one power characteristic of
The powerplant necessary for carrying out a predetermined maneuver of the aircraft on the same graphical representation on an aircraft viewing device.
This graphical representation can take several forms. For example, the graphical representation may be a dial of substantially circular shape or else on a vertical scale.
The method according to the invention can also display, during the additional display step, on the graphical representation, a guaranteed minimum power P _G of the power plant. This guaranteed minimum power P _G is determined as a function of the predictive temperature Tp and the predictive atmospheric pressure Pp at the predictive altitude Zp.
In this way, the pilot of the aircraft can view, simultaneously for the same conditions at the predictive altitude Zp, a maximum power available at the power plant, a characteristic power necessary for carrying out a predetermined maneuver and the guaranteed minimum power P _G. The display of these values advantageously allows the pilot to realize first of all, in particular when he regularly makes the same flights, that the available power margin decreases with time and with the aging of the power plant.
In addition, the display of these values also allows the pilot to see that if he can perform certain maneuvers that are demanding in terms of power today, it is thanks to the available power margin, the characteristic power necessary for carrying out of these demanding maneuvers being greater than the minimum guaranteed power P _G and with the aging of the power plant and the associated decrease in the power margin, these maneuvers can no longer be carried out with this aircraft.
In addition, the method according to the invention can also determine an instantaneous power supplied by the power plant of the aircraft and display it simultaneously at the maximum available power and at each characteristic power.
The powerplant may have a single engine. In this case, the maximum available power, the characteristic power at the level of the power plant and the instantaneous power supplied by the power plant are substantially equal respectively to a maximum available power, a characteristic power at the level of this engine and the power instantaneous provided by this engine.
The power plant can also include at least two motors. In this case, the maximum available power, the characteristic power at the power plant and the instantaneous power supplied by the power plant are distributed between these motors. When these motors are identical, these powers are preferably distributed in a substantially uniform manner between these motors. However, a particular distribution can be defined between each engine of the power plant, whether these engines are identical or different. The maximum available power and the characteristic power respectively at the level of each engine as well as the respective instantaneous power of each engine can be displayed when displaying instead of the powers of the power plant. The crew of the aircraft then has a graphical representation for each engine of the power plant.
The characteristic power and, if applicable, the instantaneous power supplied by the power plant as well as the guaranteed minimum power Pg can be displayed on the aircraft display device as a percentage of the maximum power, the maximum power then corresponding to a 100% indication on the aircraft display device. This type of display makes it possible to disregard all numerical values.
However, the maximum power and the characteristic power as well as if applicable the instantaneous power supplied by the power plant and the guaranteed minimum power Pg can be displayed as a percentage of a reference value of the power of the corresponding power plant then to a 100% indication on the display device of the aircraft.
The predetermined maneuver of a rotary wing aircraft is, for example, a hover, which consumes a large mechanical power supplied by the power plant, carried out in particular for the landing of the aircraft, the method according to the The invention is then engaged at the start of the approach phase of this hovering and executed throughout the duration of this approach phase. This predetermined maneuver can be a hover over ground effect or a hover in ground effect. The method according to the invention can, for example, simultaneously display the powers characteristic of the power plant necessary for achieving a hovering flight outside the ground effect and a hovering flight in the ground effect. This hovering flight is notably carried out in the case of an aircraft landing procedure.
In this way, the method according to the invention makes it possible to assist the pilot of the aircraft in the anticipation and in the possible implementation of a landing procedure, significantly reducing the risks associated with this landing phase. Indeed, the pilot visualizes, before initiating hovering, whether he has a sufficient power margin, and in particular during the transitions between an area where the aircraft is subjected to a ground effect and an area where the aircraft is not subject to this ground effect.
The first measurement of the current atmospheric pressure Pc and of the current temperature Te outside the aircraft is carried out by means of sensors traditionally present in an aircraft.
Then, according to a first embodiment of the invention, during the first determination, a single parameter relating to the current altitude Zc and to the predictive altitude Zp can be determined. This parameter relating to the current altitude Zc and to the predictive altitude Zp is then equal to a variation in altitude ΔΖ between the current altitude Zc and the predictive altitude Zp.
In this case, the first determination comprises for example a second measurement of a current height Hc of the aircraft relative to the ground, carried out by means of a radio altimeter, also designated "radiosonde". The variation in altitude ΔΖ is then equal to the current height Hc of the aircraft relative to the ground.
According to another example, the first determination may include the following additional sub-steps:
a sixth determination of a descent speed Vz of the aircraft,
a definition of a time of reaching Ts of the predictive altitude Zp by the aircraft, and
a first calculation of the altitude variation ΔΖ during the reaching time Ts, the altitude variation ΔΖ being equal to the ratio of the descent speed Vz by the reaching time Ts.
The time of reaching Ts of the predictive altitude Zp, may for example be a predetermined value before takeoff of the aircraft or else during the flight by the crew of the aircraft.
During the sixth determination of a descent speed Vz of the aircraft, said descent speed Vz of the aircraft is defined equal to an average value of the vertical speed of the aircraft over a predefined duration, for example equal to Last 10 seconds of flight (10s) of the aircraft before making this sixth determination.
According to a second embodiment of the invention, during the first determination, two relative parameters for a first parameter at the current altitude Zc and for a second parameter at the current altitude Zc and at the predictive altitude Zp can also be determined. A first parameter is equal to the current altitude Zc and a second parameter is equal to a variation in altitude ΔΖ between the current altitude Zc and the predictive altitude Zp.
The altitude variation ΔΖ can be determined according to one of the two examples previously mentioned for the first embodiment while the current altitude Zc of the aircraft is determined by a device traditionally present in an aircraft, such as a barometric sensor. or a GNSS receiver for the English designation "Global Navigation Satellite System".
The predictive altitude Zp can then be calculated from these two parameters and is equal to a difference between the current altitude Zc and the variation in altitude ΔΖ.
According to a third embodiment of the invention, during the first determination, two relative parameters for a first parameter at the current altitude Zc and for a second parameter at the predictive altitude Zp are determined. A first parameter is equal to the current altitude Zc and a second parameter is equal to the predictive altitude Zp.
The current altitude Zc of the aircraft is determined by a device traditionally present in an aircraft. The predictive altitude Zp of the point of completion of the predetermined aircraft maneuver can be determined in different ways.
For example, the predictive altitude Zp can be defined by the crew of the aircraft, the value of this predictive altitude Zp is directly provided by means of an input device available in the aircraft.
The predictive altitude Zp can also be extracted from a "terrain database" designated by the acronym TAWS for the English designation "Terrain Awareness Warning System". This TAWS field database associates in particular an altitude with each point of the ground overflown by the aircraft and the point of completion of the predetermined maneuver can then be identified or designated in this TAWS field database.
According to a first example of the use of such a field database, the first determination comprises the following sub-steps:
a seventh determination of a current position of the aircraft, typically by means of a GNSS receiver,
a first estimate of the predictive altitude Zp equal to an altitude of the terrain recorded in the terrain database vertical to the current position of the aircraft.
According to a second example of the use of such a field database, the first determination comprises the following sub-steps:
the seventh determination of a current position of the aircraft, a second estimate of a current trajectory of the aircraft, this current trajectory being defined for example by the direction of the forward speed vector of the aircraft, a third estimate of the predictive altitude Zp equal to an altitude of a point of contact between the current trajectory of the aircraft and the terrain recorded in the terrain database.
The predictive altitude Zp can also be defined by an alert associated with the TAWS terrain database and warning of a proximity and a possible collision of the aircraft with the terrain. The predictive altitude Zp is defined as for the second example equal to the altitude of the point of contact between the trajectory of the aircraft and the terrain.
For this third embodiment, the variation in altitude ΔΖ between the current altitude Zc and the predictive altitude Zp can then be calculated from these two parameters and is equal to a difference between the current altitude Zc and 'altitude predictive Zp.
Then, as a function of one or two parameters relating either to the current altitude Zc, or to the predictive altitude Zp, or to the current altitude Zc and to the predictive altitude Zp, the second determination makes it possible to determine the predictive atmospheric pressure Pp at predictive altitude Zp.
When the first determination is according to the first embodiment and only determines the altitude variation as a parameter, the second determination comprises the following sub-steps:
a fourth estimate of the current altitude Zc as a function only of the current atmospheric pressure Pc or else as a function of the current atmospheric pressure Pc and of the current temperature Te,
an eighth determination of a variation in atmospheric pressure ΔΡ between the current altitude Zc and the predictive altitude Zp as a function of the variation in altitude ΔΖ and using curves of variation of atmospheric pressure with altitude , and as a function of the current altitude Zc, and
a second calculation of the predictive atmospheric pressure Pp, the predictive atmospheric pressure Pp being determined by adding the variation of atmospheric pressure ΔΡ to the current atmospheric pressure Pc.
The altitude is called "barometric" when it is determined only with the current atmospheric pressure Pc. The altitude is said to be “density” when it is determined using the current atmospheric pressure Pc and the current temperature Te, the current temperature Te allowing in particular to correct the altitude provided by the current atmospheric pressure Pc.
The variation in atmospheric pressure ΔΡ is determined using one or more series of variation curves, also called abacuses, of atmospheric pressure with altitude, and as a function of the current altitude Zc.
When the first determination is according to the second or third embodiment and determines as parameters the current altitude Zc as well as the variation in altitude or else the predictive altitude Zp, the second determination of the predictive atmospheric pressure Pp comprises the sub -following steps :
- a third calculation of two normal pressures respectively for the current altitude Zc and for the predictive altitude Zp by applying a barometric leveling formula,
a ninth determination of a variation in atmospheric pressure ΔΡ equal to the difference between the two normal pressures relating to the current altitude Zc and for the predictive altitude Zp, and
a fourth calculation of the predictive atmospheric pressure Pp, the predictive atmospheric pressure Pp being determined by adding the variation of atmospheric pressure ΔΡ to the current atmospheric pressure Pc.
A barometric leveling formula makes it possible to calculate the atmospheric pressure as a function of the altitude, by taking hypotheses on a vertical temperature gradient as a function of the altitude as well as on a value of the atmospheric pressure for a reference altitude, generally the sea level corresponding to a zero altitude.
Such a barometric leveling formula therefore allows the calculation of atmospheric pressure at a certain altitude, without the need to know the temperature or the actual vertical temperature gradient. The precision of the values thus obtained can however be limited, since the average state of the atmosphere corresponding to the chosen hypotheses is generally different from the real state of the atmosphere.
However, the method according to the invention using a variation in atmospheric pressure ΔΡ equal to the difference between two normal pressures thanks to such a barometric leveling formula advantageously makes it possible to limit or even eliminate the inaccuracies generated by these assumptions.
Whatever the embodiment linked to the first determination, the third determination of the predictive temperature Tp comprises the following sub-steps:
a fifth calculation of a variation in temperature ΔΤ between I current altitude Zp and the predictive altitude Zp as a function of the variation in altitude ΔΖ, and
a sixth calculation of the predictive temperature Tp of the predictive atmospheric pressure Pp at the predictive altitude Zp, the predictive temperature Tp being determined by adding the temperature variation ΔΤ to the current temperature Te.
It is known that the variation in temperature as a function of altitude is substantially linear, in particular for the altitudes at which rotary-wing aircraft operate. For example, the temperature decreases by 0.65 degrees Celsius (0.65 ° C) for an increase in altitude of 100 meters (100m).
In addition, the total power supplied by the power plant or the power supplied by a motor in this power plant is a function of different parameters of this power plant and / or each engine in this power plant as described for example in the document FR 3033316.
For example, the instantaneous power supplied by an engine is for example defined as a function of an engine torque C _m supplied by this engine on a drive shaft and an instantaneous speed N _m of rotation of the engine drive shaft , according to the formula W _inst = C _m .N _m .
In addition, the power supplied by the powerplant of the aircraft is divided on the one hand into a flight power of the aircraft for the actual flight of the aircraft and on the other hand into an incidental power to power aircraft equipment. This accessory power is used for example to power the air conditioning of the aircraft cabin, the electrical equipment of the aircraft, such as avionics, the hydraulic equipment of the aircraft or even a sand filter when the aircraft has one. This accessory power, mainly composed of electrical power and hydraulic power, can be determined in a known manner.
The aircraft’s flight power is distributed between the main rotor and the tail rotor to ensure the aircraft’s lift and movement. This aircraft flight power is therefore the sum of the power supplied to the main rotor and the power supplied to the tail rotor level.
When a power plant comprises a single engine, the power that this engine must provide, and therefore the power plant, for the performance of the predetermined maneuver is equal to the sum of the characteristic power of this engine and the accessory power of the aircraft.
When a power plant comprises several identical motors, the power which the power plant must provide for carrying out the predetermined maneuver is equal to the sum of the characteristic power of each engine, representing the characteristic power of the power plant, and incidental power of the aircraft.
The instantaneous power supplied by each engine of the power plant can be determined in a known manner, for example by means of the instantaneous torque delivered by the engine. In addition, when this engine is a turbine engine, this instantaneous power can be determined by means of the instantaneous internal temperature T4 of the gases at the inlet of the free turbine of this turbine engine or else of the instantaneous speed of rotation Ng of sound. gas generator.
The maximum power available at the level of each engine of the power plant is determined by using aircraft performance curves and taking into account an available power margin with respect to a guaranteed minimum power Pg of each engine as described for example in document FR 3033316. The maximum available power is a function of the current surrounding conditions and the flight phase of the aircraft.
The power margin of each engine in the power plant can be determined in a known and periodic manner during an engine health check. Therefore, the method according to the invention can take this power margin into account, the fourth determination of the maximum power available at the power plant comprising the following additional steps:
a tenth determination of a power margin of each engine of the power plant with respect to a guaranteed minimum power P _G , the power margin characterizing an aging state of each engine of the power plant, and
a seventh calculation of the maximum power available at the level of each engine, this maximum available power being equal to the sum of the guaranteed minimum power Pg and the engine power margin.
However, a certain flight time may elapse between two engine health checks and the known power margin no longer corresponds to the actual state of aging of each engine. In order to take into account this real state of aging of each engine, a new determination of the power margin of each engine can be made by the method according to the invention.
In this case, the tenth determination of the power margin of each engine comprises the following additional steps:
-an eleventh determination of an evolution curve of the power margin of each engine as a function of at least two last engine health checks carried out beforehand,
a twelfth determination of a time for reaching Ts of the predictive altitude Zp by the aircraft, and
-a thirteenth determination of the power margin of each engine, of the power plant from the evolution curve of the power margin of each engine, and taking into account the operating time of each engine, from a last engine health check carried out up to the current time and taking into account the reaching time Ts.
The evolution curve of the power margin of each engine is thus defined from the last engine health checks carried out beforehand. Such a power margin evolution curve can be used from two engine health checks. However, a power margin evolution curve preferably requires at least five engine health checks carried out in order to be more representative of the aging of each engine.
The reaching time Ts determined during the twelfth determination is preferably equal to a ratio of the variation in altitude ΔΖ between the predictive altitude Zp and the current altitude Zc of the aircraft by the descent speed Vz. However, if this calculation is not feasible, the time to reach Ts may be equal to a predetermined value before takeoff of the aircraft or to a predetermined value during the flight by the crew of the aircraft.
Furthermore, the power characteristic of the power plant necessary for carrying out a predetermined maneuver of the aircraft can be determined as described for example in document FR 3033316. In addition, it is possible to use an estimated mass M of the aircraft in order to determine this power characteristic of the power plant. Indeed, the powerplant of the aircraft must provide sufficient power so that the lift of the main rotor opposes at least this estimated mass M of the aircraft. This estimated mass M of the aircraft can be determined before takeoff of the aircraft. During the flight, the instantaneous mass of the aircraft decreases following notably the fuel consumption and is then less than this estimated mass M. Consequently, this estimated mass M of the aircraft can be used in order to determine each characteristic power for carrying out a predetermined maneuver of the aircraft.
However, this characteristic power is then overvalued compared to the mechanical power actually necessary for the predetermined maneuver of the aircraft, the estimated mass M of the aircraft being greater than its instantaneous mass. This overvalued characteristic power goes in the direction of safety, the mechanical power actually required being less than this overvalued characteristic power. On the other hand, for certain maneuvers requiring significant mechanical power, this overvalued characteristic power may be greater than the maximum power available while the mechanical power actually required for the predetermined maneuver of the aircraft is less than this maximum power available for each engine. In fact, this maneuver is not carried out by the pilot who wrongly thinks that the power plant cannot provide sufficient total power.
Preferably, an estimated instantaneous mass M _inst of I aircraft is then defined and used in order to more precisely determine each characteristic power for carrying out a predetermined maneuver of the aircraft. This estimated instantaneous mass Mi _nst of the aircraft is for example determined by calculating the fuel consumption during the flight, the mass of fuel consumed then being deducted from the estimated mass M of the aircraft before takeoff.
Furthermore, the method according to the invention can also make it possible to determine and display values of at least one characteristic parameter P, relating to the state or to the operation of the aircraft or of its power plant, this parameter characteristic Λ being associated with the power of the power plant. The characteristic parameter P can also be a characteristic parameter relating to the position or the movements of the aircraft relative to its environment.
As described in document FR 3033316, for at least one characteristic parameter Pi, at least a first value Pi_hm corresponding to the maximum available power of the power plant, at least a second value Pj_X corresponding to a power characteristic of the power plant necessary for carrying out a predetermined maneuver and / or at least a third value Pi_inst corresponding to the instantaneous power supplied by the power plant can also be determined and displayed on the same graphical representation.
In this way, the pilot of the aircraft directly visualizes on the one hand a difference between the third value PiJnst and the first value Pi_lim and on the other hand the margin available to the pilot between the third value PiJnst and the second value P, _X necessary to perform the predetermined maneuver at the predictive altitude Zp.
Furthermore, it is possible to limit the amount of information provided to the pilot of the aircraft by displaying information concerning the most critical parameter Λ. One can for example display each first value Pjjim, each second value Pi_X and each third value PiJnst if necessary on an instrument for the first limitation of the aircraft.
In addition, the method according to the invention is preferably carried out when the aircraft is in stabilized flight. A flight of the aircraft is considered to be stabilized when characteristic parameters of the aircraft, and in particular a descent speed Vz and an inherent speed Vp of the aircraft as well as a torque Cm supplied by the power plant, are considered to be stable simultaneously.
A characteristic parameter of the aircraft is considered to be stable for example when, this characteristic parameter being applied to a high-pass filter, typically of the “wash out” type with a time constant τ, the difference between two consecutive values separated by this time constant τ of this characteristic parameter is less than a predetermined threshold.
A characteristic parameter of the aircraft can also be considered stable when a derivative of such a high-pass “wash out” type filter, applied to this characteristic parameter is less than another predetermined threshold.
Furthermore, the values obtained by such a high-pass “wash out” type filter for each of these parameters characteristic of the aircraft can be used in the calculations carried out by the method according to the invention. For example, the following filtered values are obtained for the characteristic parameters of the aircraft:
-the torque Cm provided by the power plant:
_Filtered cm = Measured ^cm -Y ~. with p Laplace variable,
- the aircraft's own speed Vp:
Vpfiltered ~ VPmeasured · _{1 + Tp} '
-the descent speed Vz of the aircraft:
VZfiitré ^- Vz _measured . p.
The present invention also relates to a device for predictive determination of at least one power necessary for carrying out a predetermined maneuver of a rotary wing aircraft, the device comprising a plurality of sensors, at least one computer, at least a memory and at least one display device. The sensors provide measurements of various information relating to the environment of the aircraft and / or to the state and operation of the aircraft and its equipment and / or to the position and movements of the aircraft relative to to its environment, each computer receiving the measurements from the sensors and processing this information.
The aircraft may also include a radio altimeter to determine a current height Hc of the aircraft relative to the ground. The aircraft may also include a barometric sensor or a GNSS receiver in order to determine a current altitude Zc of the aircraft.
The memory stores aircraft performance curves, an evolution curve of the power margin of each engine, one or more series of curves of variation of atmospheric pressure as a function of altitude and calculation instructions, the computer using the calculation instructions in order to implement the method of predictive determination of at least one power necessary for performing a predetermined maneuver of a rotary wing aircraft previously described.
The invention and its advantages will appear in more detail in the context of the description which follows with examples given by way of illustration with reference to the appended figures which represent:
FIG. 1, a rotary wing aircraft provided with a device for predicting determination of at least one characteristic power necessary for carrying out a predetermined maneuver of a rotary wing aircraft,
FIGS. 2 and 3, two block diagrams of a method for predictive determination of at least one characteristic power necessary for carrying out a predetermined maneuver of a rotary wing aircraft,
FIGS. 4 to 6, graphical representations of powers of the power plant of the aircraft, and
FIG. 7, an evolution curve of the power margin of an engine of the powerplant of the aircraft.
The elements present in several separate figures are assigned a single reference.
In Figure 1 is shown an aircraft 10 with rotary wing comprising a main rotor 11 provided with main blades 12, a rear rotor 13 having in particular an anti-torque function, this rear rotor 13 being provided with secondary blades 14. The aircraft 10 also comprises a power plant 20 fitted with two turboshaft engines 21,22, a main power transmission box 23 rotating the main rotor 11 and the rear rotor 13 and control means 24,25,26 composed of a collective pitch lever 24 and a cyclic handle 25 which are respectively means for controlling the variation of the collective pitch and the cyclic pitch of the main blades 12 as well as a spreader 26 which is a means of controlling the variation of the collective pitch of the blades secondary 14. These control means 24, 25, 26 allow the pilot to control movements of the aircraft 10. The two turbine engines 21, 22 are identical and include a generator. r of gas and a free turbine. These two motors 21, 22 supply substantially the same power to the main power transmission box 23 when these two motors 21, 22 operate correctly.
However, the two motors 21, 22 can be different and then supply different powers to the main power gearbox 23. A particular distribution of these powers is then defined between these motors 21, 22.
The aircraft 10 finally comprises a device 1 for predictive determination of at least one characteristic power necessary for carrying out a predetermined maneuver of the aircraft 10 comprising a plurality of sensors 5-8, a computer 2, a memory 3 and at least one display device 4 such as a screen. These sensors 5-8 make it possible to measure different information relating to the environment of the aircraft 10, to the state and to the operation of the aircraft 10 and of the power plant 20, to the state of the control means 24 , 25,26, as well as the position and movements of the aircraft 10.
The sensors 5,6 are for example a device for measuring the current atmospheric pressure Pc and a device for measuring the current temperature Te external to the aircraft 10. The sensors 7,8 are for example a means for determining the attitude and heading of the aircraft 10 such as an AHRS device for the expression in English “Attitude and Heading Reference System” and a power plant control system 20. The aircraft 10 also includes a radio altimeter 9 determining the height current Hc of the aircraft 10 relative to the ground and a device 18 for measuring a current altitude Zc of the aircraft 10, such as a barometric sensor or a GNSS receiver.
The device 1 can implement a method for predictive determination of at least one characteristic power necessary for carrying out a predetermined maneuver of the aircraft 10, the block diagrams of two embodiments are shown in FIGS. 2 and 3 The memory 3 stores performance curves for the aircraft 10, a power margin evolution curve for each engine of the power plant 20 of the aircraft 10 and calculation instructions. The computer 2 uses these calculation instructions in order to implement this method.
These two embodiments of this method comprise ten main stages and differ in terms of the sub-stages of certain main stages.
During a first measurement 110, various information relating to the environment of the aircraft 10 is measured, namely a current atmospheric pressure Pc and a current temperature Te external to the aircraft 10. This information is notably obtained via the two sensors 5,6.
During a first determination 120, at least one parameter is determined relative either to the current altitude Zc of the aircraft 10, or to a predictive altitude Zp of carrying out the predetermined maneuver of the aircraft 10, or to l current altitude Zc of the aircraft 10 and at the predictive altitude Zp of carrying out the predetermined maneuver.
According to a first embodiment of this method shown in FIG. 2, a single parameter relating to the current altitude Zc and to the predictive altitude Zp is determined during this first determination 120. This parameter is a variation in altitude ΔΖ between the current altitude Zc and the predictive altitude Zp.
According to a first example of this first embodiment, the first determination may then include a second measurement 121 of a current height Hc of the aircraft relative to the ground, carried out by means of the radio altimeter 9, and equal to the variation altitude Δtitude.
According to another example of this first embodiment, the first determination 120 may include the following sub-steps:
a sixth determination 122 of a descent speed Vz from the aircraft 10,
a definition 123 of a time of reaching Ts of the predictive altitude Zp by the aircraft 10, the time of reaching Ts being able to be defined before takeoff of the aircraft 10 or else during flight by the crew of aircraft 10, and
a first calculation 124 of the altitude variation ΔΖ during the reaching time Ts by means of the computer 2, the aircraft 10 operating with the descent speed Vz, the altitude variation ΔΖ being equal to the ratio of the speed of descent Vz by the time of reaching Ts.
According to a second embodiment of this method shown in FIG. 3, two parameters are determined during the first determination 120. A first parameter is the current altitude Zc and a second parameter is the predictive altitude Zp. k from these two parameters, the variation in altitude ΔΖ can be calculated, equal to a difference between the current altitude Zc and the predictive altitude Zp.
The current altitude Zc of the aircraft 10 is known by means of the measuring device 18.
The predictive altitude Zp of the point of completion of the predetermined maneuver of the aircraft 10 can be determined by several methods.
For example, the predictive altitude Zp can be defined by the crew of the aircraft via an input device.
The predictive altitude Zp can also be extracted from a TAWS “field database” stored in memory 3. The aircraft 10 then comprises a GNSS receiver making it possible to define the current position of the aircraft 10 via its coordinates in latitude and longitude in a terrestrial reference. This GNSS receiver can then be used as a measuring device 18 in order to measure the current altitude Zc of the aircraft 10.
The first determination 120 can then include the following two sub-steps:
a seventh determination 125 of the current position of the aircraft 10, and
a first estimate 126 of the predictive altitude Zp equal to an altitude of the terrain recorded in the terrain database vertical to this current position of the aircraft 10.
In this case, the trajectory of the aircraft 10 is not taken into account.
However, the current trajectory of the aircraft 10 can be used to determine the predictive altitude Zp by extracting a point of contact of the terrain with this trajectory in the terrain database TAWS. The trajectory of the aircraft 10 is traditionally defined by the direction of the forward speed vector of the aircraft 10.
In this case, the first determination 120 comprises the following three sub-steps:
the seventh determination 125 of the current position of the aircraft 10,
a second estimate 127 of a current trajectory of the aircraft 10, and
a third estimate 128 of the predictive altitude Zp equal to an altitude of a point of contact between the current trajectory of the aircraft 10 and the terrain recorded in the terrain database.
The predictive altitude Zp can also be defined by an alert associated with the TAWS terrain database and warning of a proximity and a possible collision of the aircraft 10 with the terrain. The predictive altitude Zp is defined equal to the altitude of a point of contact between the aircraft 10 and the terrain, this altitude being extracted from the TAWS terrain database.
Furthermore, during the first determination 120, the two determined parameters can be the current altitude Zc and the variation in altitude ΔΖ between the current altitude Zc and at the predictive altitude Zp.
The current altitude Zc is defined by means of the measuring device 18 as above and the variation in altitude ΔΖ can be determined identically to the first embodiment.
The predictive altitude Zp can then be calculated using the computer 2 from these two parameters, the predictive altitude Zp being equal to a difference between the current altitude Zc and the variation in altitude ΔΖ.
Then, during a second determination 130, a predictive atmospheric pressure Pp is determined at the predictive altitude Zp.
According to the first embodiment of this method, the second determination 130 comprises the following sub-steps:
a fourth estimate 131 of the current altitude Zc as a function only of the current atmospheric pressure Pc or else as a function of the current atmospheric pressure Pc and of the current temperature Te,
a twelfth determination 132 of a variation in atmospheric pressure ΔΡ between the current altitude Zc and the predictive altitude Zp as a function of the variation in altitude ΔΖ and using curves of variation in atmospheric pressure with the altitude, and as a function of the current altitude Zc, these atmospheric pressure variation curves being stored in memory 3, and
a second calculation 133 of the predictive atmospheric pressure Pp by means of the computer 2, the predictive atmospheric pressure Pp being determined by adding the variation of atmospheric pressure ΔΡ to the current atmospheric pressure Pc.
The only current atmospheric pressure Pc is used to estimate the barometric altitude. The current atmospheric pressure Pc and the current temperature Te, used simultaneously, are used to estimate the density altitude.
According to the second embodiment of this method, the second determination 130 comprises the following sub-steps:
a third calculation 134 of two normal pressures respectively for the current altitude Zc and for the predictive altitude Zp by applying a barometric leveling formula by means of the computer 2,
a thirteenth determination 135 of a variation in atmospheric pressure ΔΡ between the current altitude Zc and the predictive altitude Zp, the variation in atmospheric pressure ΔΡ being equal to the difference between the two normal pressures relating to the current altitude Zc and for the predictive altitude Zp,
a fourth calculation 136 of the predictive atmospheric pressure Pp by means of the computer 2, the predictive atmospheric pressure Pp being determined by adding the variation of atmospheric pressure ΔΡ to the current atmospheric pressure Pc.
A barometric leveling formula makes it possible to calculate the atmospheric pressure as a function of the altitude, by taking hypotheses on the conditions of temperature variations and the atmospheric pressure as well as on a value of the atmospheric pressure for a reference altitude.
For example, taking as hypotheses, a temperature gradient equal to 0.65 ° C for 100m and, for a reference altitude equal to 0, corresponding to sea level, a temperature equal to 15 ° C and an atmospheric pressure equal to
1013.25 hectoPascal (1013.25hPa), we obtain the following barometric leveling formula:
_ / 0.0065 xz ^{5 255} = 1013.25 x 1--) 288.15 / with the pressure P expressed in hectoPascal (or millibars) and the altitude z expressed in meters.
Furthermore, during a third determination 140, a predictive temperature Tp at the predictive altitude Zp is determined by subtracting a temperature variation ΔΤ from the current temperature Te at the current altitude Zc of the aircraft 10.
For this purpose, the third determination 140 of the predictive temperature Tp comprises the following sub-steps:
a fifth calculation 141 of a variation in temperature ΔΤ between the current altitude Zp and the predictive altitude Zp as a function of the variation in altitude ΔΖ, using for example a hypothesis for the temperature gradient, and
a sixth calculation 142 of the predictive temperature Tp at the predictive altitude Zp, by means of the computer 2, the predictive temperature Tp being determined by adding the temperature variation ΔΤ to the current temperature Te.
The two stages of second and third determinations 130, 140 can be carried out simultaneously or else sequentially.
During a fourth determination 150, a maximum power available at the power plant 20 at the predictive altitude Zp is determined by taking into account the predictive atmospheric pressure Pp and the predictive temperature Tp.
The maximum power available at the power plant 20 is equal to the sum of the maximum powers available at the two motors 21,22 in the power plant 20. This maximum power available at a motor 21,22 can for example be equal to the minimum guaranteed power of each engine determined by using a performance curve of the aircraft 10 as a function of atmospheric pressure and temperature.
In addition, during this fourth determination 150, the maximum power available at the power plant 20 can be determined by taking into account the aging of each engine 21,22. To this end, the fourth determination 150 comprises additional steps:
a tenth determination 151 of a power plant power margin 20 vis-à-vis a guaranteed minimum power Pg, the power margin characterizing an aging state of the power plant 20, and
a seventh calculation 152 of the maximum power available at the power plant 20, this maximum available power being equal to the sum of the minimum guaranteed power Pg, determined by means of a performance curve as a function of the predictive atmospheric pressure Pp and predictive temperature Tp, and the power margin of the power plant 20.
This power margin of each engine can be equal to the value of the power margin determined during the last engine health check.
This power margin of each engine can also be determined by taking into account the time of use since this last engine health check, as well as the flight time necessary to reach the point where the predetermined maneuver will be carried out. In this hypothesis, the eighth determination 151 of the power plant power margin 20 includes additional steps:
an eleventh determination 155 of an evolution curve of the power margin of each engine 21, 22 of the power plant 20 as a function of at least two last engine health checks of the power plant 20 carried out beforehand, this evolution curve of the power margin being stored in memory 3,
a twelfth determination 156 of a time of reaching Ts at the predictive altitude Zp by the aircraft 10 preferably carried out by dividing the variation in altitude ΔΖ between the predictive altitude Zp and the current altitude Zc of the aircraft 10 by the descent speed Vz, and
a thirteenth determination 157 of the power margin of the power plant 20 from the evolution curve of the power margin of the power plant 20 and taking into account the operating time of the power plant 20 since a last engine health check carried out until the current time and taking into account the time of reaching Ts.
An example of an evolution curve of the power margin of a motor 21, 22 is shown in FIG. 7.
This curve for the evolution of the power margin of an engine 21, 22 was constructed thanks to the measurements A, B, C, D of the power margin obtained during the last engine health checks carried out respectively at times t _A , tB, tc, tD, this power margin being the difference between the power actually available at the power plant 20 and the minimum guaranteed power Pg of the power plant 20. Therefore, knowing the operating time of the power plant 20 up to the current time t _E and the time of reaching Ts the predictive altitude Zp by the aircraft 10, we can estimate at point F the power margin actually available at the power plant 20 with respect to the guaranteed minimum power P _G at the instant t _{F at} which the aircraft 10 will arrive at the point of carrying out the predetermined maneuver, namely at 'predictive altitude Zp.
The power margin actually available at the power plant 20 at the current time t _E corresponding to point E can also be determined by an engine health check carried out during flight. This power margin actually available at point E can thus be integrated into the evolution curve before estimating the power margin actually available at the power plant 20 at time t _F.
During a fifth determination 160, at least one power characteristic of the power plant 20 necessary for the performance of a predetermined maneuver of the aircraft 10 is determined. A power characteristic of the power plant 20 necessary for the performance of a predetermined maneuver of the aircraft 10 is determined by the computer 2 and thanks to performance curves relating to the predetermined maneuver stored in memory 3. A predetermined maneuver of the aircraft 10 is for example a hovering flight of 1 aircraft 10 excluding ground effect or hovering in ground effect.
The method can then include an additional display step 200 on the same graphical representation, on the display device 4, simultaneously with a maximum power available at the power plant 20 and at least one characteristic power. of the power plant 20 necessary for carrying out a predetermined maneuver of the aircraft 10. The minimum guaranteed power P _G can also be displayed on this graphical representation.
The graphical representation on the display device 4 can take several forms such as a dial 30 of substantially circular shape shown in Figures 4 and 5 or a vertical scale 40 shown in Figure 6.
In FIG. 4, a needle 31 is movable in rotation on the dial 30 and indicates respectively the instantaneous power supplied by the power plant 20. Markers 34, 35 positioned outside the dial 30 indicate two powers characteristic of the powerplant 20 necessary for hovering of the aircraft 10 outside the ground effect and a hover in the ground effect. The position of each reference mark 34, 35 can change according to the flight conditions of the aircraft 10 and according to the environmental conditions surrounding the aircraft 10. The characteristic powers and the instantaneous power are represented on the dial 30 according to a percentage of, the maximum power available at the power plant 20, this maximum power corresponding to reference 39 representing a value of 100% on the dial 30.
However, the characteristic powers, the instantaneous power and the maximum power can be represented on the dial 30 according to a percentage of a power reference value.
In addition, the graduations of the dial 30 go beyond 100%, because the maximum power generally corresponds to normal and continuous operation of the aircraft 10 and of the engines in particular, but may be temporarily exceeded by the instantaneous power. . In addition, a characteristic power can exceed the maximum power, meaning that the predetermined maneuver cannot be performed in a safe manner under the flight conditions that the aircraft 10 will encounter for carrying out the predetermined maneuver.
Thus, the pilot easily and quickly visualizes on the one hand a first margin which he has between the instantaneous power and the maximum power and on the other hand a second margin which he has between each characteristic power and the maximum power. Consequently, the pilot can adapt the use of the power of the power plant 20 according to the first margin and anticipate the completion of the predetermined maneuver according to the second margin.
In FIG. 5, the power indications are represented for each engine 21, 22 of the power plant 20. In fact, two hands 31, 31 ′ are movable in rotation on the dial 30 and respectively indicate the instantaneous power supplied by each. of the motors 21,22 of the power plant 20. The references 34,35 indicate two powers characteristic of each motor 21,22 necessary for the hovering of the aircraft 10 out of ground effect and a hover in the ground effect and the reference 39 indicates the maximum power available at the level of each motor 21,22.
Furthermore, whatever the embodiment, the method of predictive determination of at least one characteristic power necessary for carrying out a predetermined maneuver of an aircraft 10 is preferably carried out when the aircraft 10 is in stabilized flight. Namely, characteristic parameters of the aircraft 10, and in particular a descent speed Kz and a proper speed Vp of the aircraft 10 as well as a torque Cm supplied by the power plant 20, are considered to be stable simultaneously.
In order to determine whether a characteristic parameter of the aircraft 10 is stable, a high-pass filter, typically of the "wash out" type, is for example applied to this characteristic parameter. This high pass filter has a time constant τ. This characteristic parameter of the aircraft 10 is for example considered to be stable when the difference between two consecutive values separated by this time constant τ from this characteristic parameter is less than a predetermined threshold. This characteristic parameter can also be considered stable when a derivative of this high-pass filter is less than another predetermined threshold.
For example, if a characteristic parameter is the torque supplied by the power plant 20, it can be considered that a variation of this torque less than 1% over a period of one minute is a case of stability. The threshold applied to the high-pass filter can then be equal to 1/60% / s as soon as the torque of the power plant 20 is kept below this threshold over a few measurement cycles corresponding to ten seconds.
Naturally, the present invention is subject to numerous variations as to its implementation. Although several embodiments have been described, it is understood that it is not conceivable to identify exhaustively all the possible modes. It is of course conceivable to replace a means described by an equivalent means without departing from the scope of the present invention.

权利要求:
Claims (21)
[1" id="c-fr-0001]
1. Method for predictive determination of at least one characteristic power necessary for carrying out a predetermined maneuver of a rotary wing aircraft (10), said aircraft (10) comprising a power plant (20), a plurality of sensors (5-8), at least one computer (2), at least one memory (3) and at least one display device (4), said method comprising the following main steps:
a first measurement (110) of a current atmospheric pressure Pc and of a current temperature Te external to said aircraft (10) at a current altitude Zc of said aircraft (10),
a first determination (120) of at least one parameter relating either to said current altitude Zc of said aircraft (10), or to a predictive altitude Zp of carrying out said predetermined maneuver of said aircraft (10), or to said current altitude Zc of said aircraft (10) and at said predictive altitude Zp of carrying out said predetermined maneuver of said aircraft (10).
a second determination (130) of a predictive atmospheric pressure Pp at said predictive altitude Zp,
a third determination (140) of a predictive temperature Tp at said predictive altitude Zp,
a fourth determination (150) of a maximum power available at the level of said power plant (20) at said predictive altitude Zp by taking into account said predictive atmospheric pressure Pp and said predictive temperature Tp,
a fifth determination (160) of at least one power characteristic of said power plant (20) necessary for said performance of said predetermined maneuver of said aircraft (10).
[2" id="c-fr-0002]
2. Method according to claim 1, characterized in that during said first determination (120), a single parameter relating to said current altitude Zc and to said predictive altitude Zp is determined and is a variation in altitude ΔΖ between said current altitude Zc and said predictive altitude Zp.
[3" id="c-fr-0003]
3. Method according to claim 1, characterized in that during said first determination (120), two parameters relating either to said current altitude Zc, or to said current altitude Zc and to said predictive altitude Zp are determined, a first parameter being said current altitude Zc and a second parameter being a variation in altitude ΔΖ between said current altitude Zc and said predictive altitude Zp.
[4" id="c-fr-0004]
4. Method according to any one of claims 2 to 3, characterized in that said first determination (120) comprises a second measurement (121) of a current height Hc of said aircraft (10) relative to the ground, said variation d altitude ΔΖ being equal to said current height Hc.
[5" id="c-fr-0005]
5. Method according to any one of claims 2 to 3, characterized in that said first determination (120) comprises the following substeps:
a sixth determination (122) of a descent speed Vz of said aircraft (10),
a definition (123) of a time for reaching Ts of said predictive altitude Zp by said aircraft (10), and
a first calculation (124) of said variation in altitude ΔΖ equal to the ratio of said descent speed Vz by said reaching time Ts.
[6" id="c-fr-0006]
6. Method according to claim 1, characterized in that during said first determination (120), two parameters relating either to said current altitude Zc or to said predictive altitude Zp are determined, a first parameter being said current altitude Zc and a second parameter being said predictive altitude Zp, a variation in altitude ΔΖ being equal to a difference between said current altitude Zc and said predictive altitude Zp.
[7" id="c-fr-0007]
7. Method according to claim 6, characterized in that during said first determination (120), said predictive altitude Zp is extracted from a terrain database.
[8" id="c-fr-0008]
8. Method according to claim 7, characterized in that said first determination (120) comprises the following substeps:
a seventh determination (125) of a current position of said aircraft (10), and
a first estimate (126) of said predictive altitude Zp equal to an altitude of the terrain recorded in said terrain database vertical to said current position of said aircraft (10).
[9" id="c-fr-0009]
9. Method according to claim 7, characterized in that said first determination (120) comprises the following substeps:
a seventh determination (125) of a current position of said aircraft (10),
a second estimate (127) of a current trajectory of said aircraft (10), and
a third estimate (128) of said predictive altitude Zp equal to an altitude of a point of contact between said current trajectory of said aircraft (10) and the terrain recorded in said terrain database.
[10" id="c-fr-0010]
10. Method according to any one of claims 2 to 5, characterized in that, during said first determination (120), a single parameter relating to said current altitude Zc and to said predictive altitude Zp is determined, said second determination (130) of said predictive atmospheric pressure Pp comprises the following sub-steps:
a fourth estimate (131) of said current altitude Zc as a function only of said current atmospheric pressure Pc or else as a function of said current atmospheric pressure Pc and of said current temperature Te,
an eighth determination (132) of a variation in atmospheric pressure ΔΡ between said current altitude Zc and said predictive altitude Zp as a function of said variation in altitude ΔΖ and using curves of variation of said atmospheric pressure with the altitude, and as a function of said current altitude Zc, and
a second calculation (133) of said predictive atmospheric pressure Pp, said predictive atmospheric pressure Pp being determined by adding said variation of atmospheric pressure ΔΡ to said current atmospheric pressure Pc.
[11" id="c-fr-0011]
11. Method according to any one of claims 3 to 9, characterized in that, during said first determination (120), two parameters relating either to said current altitude Zc, or to said predictive altitude Zp, or to said current altitude Zc and at said predictive altitude Zp are determined, said second determination (130) of said predictive atmospheric pressure Pp comprises the following substeps:
a third calculation (134) of two normal pressures respectively for said current altitude Zc and for said predictive altitude Zp by applying a barometric leveling formula,
a ninth determination (135) of a variation in atmospheric pressure ΔΡ between said current altitude Zc and said predictive altitude Zp, said variation in atmospheric pressure ΔΡ being equal to the difference between said two normal pressures relating to said current altitude Zc and for said predictive altitude Zp, and
a fourth calculation (136) of said predictive atmospheric pressure Pp, said predictive atmospheric pressure Pp being determined by adding said variation of atmospheric pressure ΔΡ to said current atmospheric pressure Pc.
[12" id="c-fr-0012]
12. Method according to any one of claims 2 to 11, characterized in that said third determination (140) of said predictive temperature Tp comprises:
a fifth calculation (141) of a variation in temperature ΔΤ between said current altitude Zp and said predictive altitude Zp as a function of said variation in altitude ΔΖ, and
a sixth calculation (142) of said predictive temperature Tp of said predictive atmospheric pressure Pp at said predictive altitude Zp, said predictive temperature Tp being determined by adding said temperature variation ΔΤ to said current temperature Te.
[13" id="c-fr-0013]
13. Method according to any one of claims 1 to 12, characterized in that said method comprises an additional step (200) of simultaneously displaying said maximum power available at said power plant (20) and at least a power characteristic of said power plant (20) necessary for said realization of a predetermined maneuver of said aircraft (10) on the same graphical representation on a display device (4).
[14" id="c-fr-0014]
14. Method according to claim 13, characterized in that during said additional step (200) of said display, a guaranteed minimum power Pg of said power plant (20) is displayed on said graphical representation, said guaranteed minimum power Pg being determined as a function of said predictive temperature Tp and said predictive atmospheric pressure Pp at said predictive altitude Zp.
[15" id="c-fr-0015]
15. Method according to any one of claims 1 to 14, characterized in that said fourth determination (150) of said maximum power available at said power plant (20) comprises the following additional steps:
a tenth determination (151) of a power margin of said power plant (20) with respect to a guaranteed minimum power Pg, said power margin characterizing an aging state of said power plant (20), and a seventh calculation (152) of said maximum power available at said power plant (20), said maximum power available being equal to the sum of said minimum guaranteed power Pg and said power margin of said power plant (20 ).
[16" id="c-fr-0016]
16. Method according to claim 15, characterized in that said fourteenth determination (151) of said power margin of said power plant (20) comprises the following additional steps:
an eleventh determination (155) of an evolution curve of said power margin of said power plant (20) as a function of at least two last engine health checks of said power plant (20) carried out beforehand,
a twelfth determination (156) of a time for reaching Ts of said predictive altitude Zp by said aircraft (10), and
a thirteenth determination (157) of said power margin of said power plant (20) from said evolution curve of said power margin of said power plant (20) and taking into account the operating time of said motor installation (20) since a last engine health check carried out up to the current time and taking into account said time of reaching Ts.
[17" id="c-fr-0017]
17. Method according to any one of claims 1 to 16, characterized in that a predetermined maneuver of said aircraft (10) is a hover of said aircraft (10) out of ground effect or a hover in said ground effect .
[18" id="c-fr-0018]
18. Method according to any one of claims 1 to 17, characterized in that said method is carried out when said aircraft (10) is in stabilized flight, a flight of said aircraft (10) being considered to be stabilized when a speed of descent Vz and a proper speed Vp of said aircraft (10) as well as a torque Cm supplied by said power plant (20) are considered to be stable simultaneously.
[19" id="c-fr-0019]
19. Method according to claim 18, characterized in that said descent speed Vz, said natural speed Vp and said torque Cm are characteristic parameters of said aircraft (10) and a characteristic parameter is considered to be stable when, said characteristic parameter being applied to a high-pass filter, typically of the “wash out” type, with a time constant τ, a difference between two consecutive values separated by said time constant τ from said characteristic parameter is less than a predetermined threshold.
[20" id="c-fr-0020]
20. The method of claim 19, characterized in that values obtained by said filter for said descent speed Vz, said natural speed Vp and said torque Cm, are used in the calculations carried out by said method of predictive determination of at least a characteristic power necessary for carrying out a predetermined maneuver of a rotary wing aircraft (10).
[21" id="c-fr-0021]
21. Device (1) for predictive determination of at least one power necessary for carrying out a predetermined maneuver of a rotary wing aircraft (10), said device (1) comprising a plurality of sensors (5-8) , at least one computer (2), at least one memory (3) and at least one display device (4), said sensors (5-8) providing measurements of different information relating to the environment of said aircraft (10) and / or the state and operation of said aircraft (10) 5 and its equipment and / or the position and movements of said aircraft (10) relative to its environment, each computer (2) receiving said measurements from said sensors (5-8) and processing said information, characterized in that said memory (3) stores performance curves of said aircraft (10), an evolution curve of said power margin of said power plant (20), a or several series of curves of variation of said atmospheric pressure as a function of the altitude and of the calculation instructions, said computer (2) using said calculation instructions 15 in order to implement the method for determining parameters characteristic of the operation of said aircraft (10) according to the any of claims 1 to 20.

类似技术:

---

公开号 | 公开日 | 专利标题

---

EP3064437B1|2018-08-22|A method and a device for determining and optimizing parameters that are characteristic of the operation of a rotary wing aircraft

---

EP2568295B1|2014-01-15|Method and apparatus for the automatic estimation of airspeed of an aircraft

---

EP3597536A1|2020-01-22|Method and device for predictive determination of characteristic parameters of the operation of a rotary-wing aircraft for the performance of a predetermined manoeuvre

---

EP2505502B1|2013-10-16|Method and device to assist piloting of an aircraft, and aircraft

---

EP2236988A1|2010-10-06|Method for determining and displaying piloting indications and piloting indicator for implementing said method

---

FR2894046A1|2007-06-01|Take-off parameter inputting error detecting method for aircraft, involves comparing limit value with take-off characteristics value, and alerting pilot via interface of flight management system when result of comparison is erroneous

---

WO2013144126A2|2013-10-03|Method for determining a state of credibility of measurements made by sensors of an aircraft and corresponding system

---

FR2871520A1|2005-12-16|STEERING INDICATOR FOR PREDICTING THE EVOLUTION OF THE MONITORING PARAMETERS OF A TURBOMOTEUR

---

WO2013156279A1|2013-10-24|Device for displaying flight characteristics of an aircraft, aircraft instruments, and related method

---

EP3263452B1|2018-09-26|Improving in detecting that a rotorcraft is approaching a vortex domain and signaling that detection

---

EP3098579B1|2019-07-03|A method of estimating the instantaneous mass of a rotary wing aircraft

---

FR3031729A1|2016-07-22|POWER CONTROL FOR AIRCRAFT AIRCRAFT

---

WO2013144157A1|2013-10-03|Method for determining a credibility state of measurements from an incidence sensor of an aircraft, and corresponding system

---

EP3045920B1|2017-04-05|A method and a device for determining the wind speed to be taken into account in order to optimize the takeoff weight of an aircraft

---

EP1904821B1|2011-06-22|Indicator for piloting an aircraft, designed to provide a power parameter of at least one turboprop engine of said aircraft

---

EP2623746B1|2015-04-15|Method for optimising the performance of an aircraft, device and aircraft

---

FR2895793A1|2007-07-06|Military transport aircraft pilot assisting method, involves starting section from current position of aircraft and displaying in indicator with respect to size and scale of indicator, and determining current phase of flight and altitudes

---

FR3037413A1|2016-12-16|ELECTRONIC DEVICE AND METHOD FOR AIDING THE CONTROL OF AN AIRCRAFT WITH CALCULATION AND DISPLAY OF AT LEAST ONE ROLL MARGIN, COMPUTER PROGRAM PRODUCT

---

EP0811183B1|1999-06-16|Flight control assistance device

---

EP2957975B1|2018-05-02|Method and device for controlling at least one actuator control system of an aircraft, related computer program product and aircraft

---

WO2016177971A1|2016-11-10|Method for monitoring an aircraft engine in operation during a flight

---

FR3053460A1|2018-01-05|ASSISTANCE METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR DETECTING DEGRADATION OF AIRCRAFT PERFORMANCE

---

EP3251955B1|2018-09-26|A method and a device for assisting the piloting of an aircraft, and an aircraft

---

FR3081597A1|2019-11-29|METHOD AND DEVICE FOR DETERMINING AND DISPLAYING A SAFETY DISTANCE OF A GIRAVION BY TAKING INTO ACCOUNT WAVE HEIGHT

---

EP3647192A1|2020-05-06|Method and device for assisted piloting of a hybrid rotorcraft provided with a lift rotor and at least one propulsion rotor generating thrust

同族专利:

---

公开号 | 公开日

---

EP3597536B1|2021-01-13|

---

FR3084057B1|2020-06-19|

---

US20200023993A1|2020-01-23|

---

CA3050003C|2021-03-23|

---

CA3050003A1|2019-09-18|

---

US10994863B2|2021-05-04|

---

EP3597536A1|2020-01-22|

引用文献:

---

公开号 | 申请日 | 公开日 | 申请人 | 专利标题

---

DE2014913A1|1969-03-26|1970-10-08|The Bendix Corp., Southfield, Mich. |Calculation and display device|

---

FR2749545A1|1996-06-07|1997-12-12|Eurocopter France|STEERING INDICATOR FOR AIRCRAFT|

---

FR2756256A1|1996-11-26|1998-05-29|Eurocopter France|Power margin indicator for helicopters|

---

WO2005120954A2|2004-03-15|2005-12-22|Howell Instruments, Inc.|System and method for monitoring aircraft engine health and determining engine power available, and applications thereof|

---

US20050278084A1|2004-06-15|2005-12-15|Bernard Certain|Pilot indicator for predicting changes in the monitoring parameters of a gas turbine engine|

---

WO2012087303A1|2010-12-22|2012-06-28|Bell Helicopter Textron Inc.|Power safety instrument system|

---

EP3064437A1|2015-03-04|2016-09-07|Airbus Helicopters|A method and a device for determining and optimizing parameters that are characteristic of the operation of a rotary wing aircraft|

---

FR3033316A1|2015-03-04|2016-09-09|Airbus Helicopters|METHOD AND DEVICE FOR DETERMINING AND OPTIMIZING CHARACTERISTIC PARAMETERS OF THE OPERATION OF A ROTARY WING AIRCRAFT|EP3868659A1|2020-02-20|2021-08-25|Airbus Helicopters|Power margin monitoring device for rotorcraft, associated rotorcraft and corresponding method|AU2919300A|1999-03-01|2000-09-21|Natural Colour Kari Kirjavainen Oy|Method of steering aircraft, and aircraft|

---

US6873887B2|2001-11-13|2005-03-29|Goodrich Pump & Engine Control Systems, Inc.|Rotor torque anticipator|

---

US7275711B1|2004-02-23|2007-10-02|Kenneth Warren Flanigan|Gas-powered tip-jet-driven compound VTOL aircraft|

---

US9355571B2|2008-01-23|2016-05-31|Sikorsky Aircraft Corporation|Modules and methods for biasing power to a multi-engine power plant suitable for one engine inoperative flight procedure training|

---

US20100161196A1|2008-12-23|2010-06-24|Honeywell International Inc.|Operations support systems and methods with engine diagnostics|

---

US8417410B2|2008-12-23|2013-04-09|Honeywell International Inc.|Operations support systems and methods with power management|

---

FR2973340B1|2011-03-30|2013-04-12|Eurocopter France|METHOD, DEVICE FOR AIDING THE CONTROL OF AN AIRCRAFT, AND AIRCRAFT|

---

US10956534B2|2013-02-20|2021-03-23|Honeywell International Inc.|System and method for continuous performance analysis of systems that exhibit variable performance characteristics at different operating conditions|

---

CA2958848A1|2014-08-28|2016-03-03|Pascal Chretien|Electromagnetic distributed direct drive for aircraft|US11181934B1|2020-05-20|2021-11-23|Honeywell International Inc.|Systems and methods for predicting ground effects along a flight plan|

法律状态:
2019-07-19| PLFP| Fee payment|Year of fee payment: 2 |

---

2020-01-24| PLSC| Search report ready|Effective date: 20200124 |

---

2020-07-22| PLFP| Fee payment|Year of fee payment: 3 |

---

2021-07-28| PLFP| Fee payment|Year of fee payment: 4 |

优先权:

---

申请号 | 申请日 | 专利标题

---

FR1800756|2018-07-17|

---

FR1800756A|FR3084057B1|2018-07-17|2018-07-17|METHOD AND DEVICE FOR PREDICTIVE DETERMINATION OF CHARACTERISTIC PARAMETERS OF THE OPERATION OF A TURNING AIRCRAFT FOR THE CARRYING OUT OF A PREDETERMINED MANEUVER|FR1800756A| FR3084057B1|2018-07-17|2018-07-17|METHOD AND DEVICE FOR PREDICTIVE DETERMINATION OF CHARACTERISTIC PARAMETERS OF THE OPERATION OF A TURNING AIRCRAFT FOR THE CARRYING OUT OF A PREDETERMINED MANEUVER|

---

EP19185359.7A| EP3597536B1|2018-07-17|2019-07-10|Method and device for predictive determination of characteristic parameters of the operation of a rotary-wing aircraft for the performance of a predetermined manoeuvre|

---

CA3050003A| CA3050003C|2018-07-17|2019-07-16|Process and device for predictive determination of characteristic operation parameters for a rotary winged aircraft for the implementation of a predetermined maneuver|

---

US16/514,036| US10994863B2|2018-07-17|2019-07-17|Method and a device for predictive determination of parameters characteristic of the operation of a rotary-wing aircraft in order to perform a predetermined maneuver|